Opinion
8:24-cv-1740-JLB-TGW
10-31-2024
MICHAEL ATTARD, on behalf of Shania Chockren, Plaintiff, v. SHERIFF DEPARTMENT and PROSECUTOR, Defendants.
ORDER
JOHN L. BADALAMENTI, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
The Magistrate Judge has entered a Report and Recommendation, recommending that this case be dismissed with prejudice because Plaintiff cannot sue on behalf of a third-party as detailed in the Report and Recommendation. (Doc. 3). No party has objected, and the time to do so has expired.
A district judge may accept, reject, or modify the magistrate judge's report and recommendation. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). The district judge must “make a de novo determination of those portions of the report or specified proposed findings or recommendations to which objection is made.” Id.
Here, after an independent review of the entire record, and noting that no objection has been filed, the Court finds that the thorough and well-reasoned Report and Recommendation is due to be adopted.
Accordingly, it is ORDERED that:
1. The Report and Recommendation (Doc. 3) is ADOPTED and made a part of this Order for all purposes.
2. This case is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE because Plaintiff cannot sue on behalf of a third-party as detailed in the Report and Recommendation.
3. The Clerk is DIRECTED to terminate any pending deadlines and close the file.