From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Atlas v. Smily

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Jan 19, 2017
146 A.D.3d 623 (N.Y. App. Div. 2017)

Opinion

01-19-2017

Louis M. ATLAS, Plaintiff–Respondent, v. Frances SMILY, Defendant–Appellant.

Frances Smily, appellant pro se. Louis M. Atlas P.C., New York (Louis M. Atlas of counsel), for respondent.


Frances Smily, appellant pro se.

Louis M. Atlas P.C., New York (Louis M. Atlas of counsel), for respondent.

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Matthew F. Cooper, J.), entered March 4, 2016, which denied defendant wife's motion to vacate the parties' stipulation of settlement, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The motion court properly denied defendant's motion to set aside the open-court stipulation of settlement, as there was no showing of fraud, overreaching, mistake, or duress (see Hallock v. State of New York, 64 N.Y.2d 224, 230, 485 N.Y.S.2d 510, 474 N.E.2d 1178 [1984] ; Matter of Strang v. Rathbone, 108 A.D.3d 565, 565–566, 968 N.Y.S.2d 572 [2d Dept.2013] ). The parties were represented by able and experienced counsel, and had negotiated the agreement for a period of time. Further, the motion court conducted a proper allocution of defendant and properly determined that she voluntarily and knowingly accepted the terms of the stipulation (see Matter of Strang, 108 A.D.3d at 566, 968 N.Y.S.2d 572 ).

We have considered defendant's remaining contentions and find them unavailing.

FRIEDMAN, J.P., RENWICK, RICHTER, MOSKOWITZ, KAPNICK, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Atlas v. Smily

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Jan 19, 2017
146 A.D.3d 623 (N.Y. App. Div. 2017)
Case details for

Atlas v. Smily

Case Details

Full title:Louis M. ATLAS, Plaintiff–Respondent, v. Frances SMILY…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.

Date published: Jan 19, 2017

Citations

146 A.D.3d 623 (N.Y. App. Div. 2017)
146 A.D.3d 623
2017 N.Y. Slip Op. 422

Citing Cases

Weksler v. Weksler (In re Weksler)

"As with a contract, courts should not disturb a valid stipulation absent a showing of good cause such as…