Opinion
Civil Action 2:21-CV-00430-JRG-RSP
08-16-2023
ATLAS GLOBAL TECHNOLOGIES LLC, Plaintiff, v. TP-LINK TECHNOLOGIES CO., LTD., TP-LINK CORPORATION LIMITED, TP-LINK INTERNATIONAL LTD., Defendants.
ORDER
RODNEY GILSTRAP UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE.
Plaintiff Atlas Global previously filed a Motion for Summary Judgment on Defendants'Counterclaim (“Motion”) (Dkt. No. 198). Magistrate Judge Payne entered a Report and Recommendation (Dkt. No. 256), recommending grant of Atlas Global's Motion. Defendants have now filed Objections (Dkt. No. 271).
TP-Link Technologies Co., Ltd. and TP-Link Corporation, Ltd., f/k/a TP-Link International, Ltd.'s (collectively, “Defendants”).
After conducting a de novo review of the briefing on the Motion, the Report and Recommendation, and the Objections, the Court agrees with the reasoning provided within the Report and Recommendation and concludes that the Objections fail to show that the Report and Recommendation was erroneous. Consequently, the Court OVERRULES Defendants' Objections and ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation, and ORDERS that the Motion (Dkt. No. 198) is GRANTED.
So Ordered.