From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Atlantic Mut. v. Brotech

United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit
May 12, 1995
60 F.3d 813 (3d Cir. 1995)

Summary

finding that "courts have consistently held that there must be a causal connection between the injury alleged in the underlying complaint and the insured's advertising activity"

Summary of this case from Flakt v. Natl. Union Fire Ins. Co.

Opinion

No. 94-1897.

May 12, 1995.

E.D.Pa., 857 F.Supp. 423.


AFFIRMED


Summaries of

Atlantic Mut. v. Brotech

United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit
May 12, 1995
60 F.3d 813 (3d Cir. 1995)

finding that "courts have consistently held that there must be a causal connection between the injury alleged in the underlying complaint and the insured's advertising activity"

Summary of this case from Flakt v. Natl. Union Fire Ins. Co.

In Abdullah v. AMR Corp., No. 95-7025, 60 F.3d 813 (3d Cir. 1995), the Third Circuit provided a comprehensive overview of the issue.

Summary of this case from Hawksbill Sea Turtle v. Federal Emergency Management Agency
Case details for

Atlantic Mut. v. Brotech

Case Details

Full title:Atlantic Mut. Ins. Corp. v. Brotech Corp. v. Planet Ins. Co

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit

Date published: May 12, 1995

Citations

60 F.3d 813 (3d Cir. 1995)

Citing Cases

Frog, Switch & Manufacturing Co. v. Travelers Insurance

General rules of insurance contract construction require us to read the policy as a whole and construe it…

Feldman Law Grp .P.C. v. Liberty Mut. Ins. Co.

28. Kvaerner Metals Div. of Kvaerner U.S., Inc. v. Commercial Union Ins. Co., 589 Pa. 317, 331, 908 A.2d 888…