From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Atlanta Gas-Light Company v. Farrell

Supreme Court of Georgia
Jun 11, 1940
9 S.E.2d 625 (Ga. 1940)

Opinion

13191.

JUNE 11, 1940.

Certiorari; from Court of Appeals.

Alston, Foster, Moise Sibley and Henry J. Miller, for plaintiff in error.

McElreath, Scott, Duckworth DuVall, contra.


The Court of Appeals correctly held that the appliance in question became a part of the realty upon its installation as an adjunct of the furnace, and that as against the owner or a purchaser of the realty the tenant had no authority to contract with a conditional vendor for the removal of such appliance upon failure to pay the purchase money. Farrell v. Atlanta Gas-Light Co., 61 Ga. App. 18 ( 5 S.E.2d 607). The decision of the Court of Appeals appears to be correct as applied to the facts shown, and to afford no cause of complaint to the petitioner in certiorari.

Judgment affirmed. All the Justices concur.

No. 13191. JUNE 11, 1940.


Summaries of

Atlanta Gas-Light Company v. Farrell

Supreme Court of Georgia
Jun 11, 1940
9 S.E.2d 625 (Ga. 1940)
Case details for

Atlanta Gas-Light Company v. Farrell

Case Details

Full title:ATLANTA GAS-LIGHT COMPANY v. FARRELL et al

Court:Supreme Court of Georgia

Date published: Jun 11, 1940

Citations

9 S.E.2d 625 (Ga. 1940)
9 S.E.2d 625

Citing Cases

Burpee v. Athens Production Credit Ass'n

An innocent owner is not to be deprived of his property merely because some other person may be the purchaser…