From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Atlanta Development Co. v. Peel & Sons, Ltd.

Court of Appeals of Georgia
Dec 2, 1988
377 S.E.2d 552 (Ga. Ct. App. 1988)

Opinion

77622.

DECIDED DECEMBER 2, 1988.

Appeal dismissal. DeKalb State Court. Before Judge Hunter.

William F. C. Skinner, Jr., for appellant.

Zion, Tarleton Siskin, John J. Tarleton, for appellee.


"This is an appeal from an order denying a motion to intervene and add a party defendant in a case pending in the trial court. Since the order appealed from is not a final judgment [cits.], and the interlocutory appeal procedure specified by [OCGA § 5-6-34 (b)] has not been followed, the appeal must be dismissed. [Cits.]" Wallace v. Bledsoe, 244 Ga. 674 ( 261 S.E.2d 399) (1979).

Appeal dismissed. Birdsong, C. J., and Beasley, J., concur.

DECIDED DECEMBER 2, 1988.


Summaries of

Atlanta Development Co. v. Peel & Sons, Ltd.

Court of Appeals of Georgia
Dec 2, 1988
377 S.E.2d 552 (Ga. Ct. App. 1988)
Case details for

Atlanta Development Co. v. Peel & Sons, Ltd.

Case Details

Full title:ATLANTA DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, LTD. v. PEEL SONS, LTD

Court:Court of Appeals of Georgia

Date published: Dec 2, 1988

Citations

377 S.E.2d 552 (Ga. Ct. App. 1988)
377 S.E.2d 552

Citing Cases

Morman v. Board of Regents, the University System

The denial of a motion to intervene is not a final judgment and thus, is reviewable under the interlocutory…

In the Interest of H. E. M

"The denial of a motion to intervene is not a final judgment and thus, is reviewable under the interlocutory…