("[W]here a lender's influence on a debtor's actions merely arises by operating of bargained-for rights under a credit agreement, those ‘reasonable financial controls negotiated at arms’-length between a lender and a borrower do not transform a lender into an insider.’ " (quoting Radnor , 353 B.R. at 847 )); id. 2010 WL 3522132, at *9, 2010 Bankr. LEXIS 2720, at **22-23 (determining that complaint's allegations were insufficient to allow the court to infer insider status where they indicated nothing more than a normal distressed-borrower/lender relationship in which debtor managed its own affairs and used its own judgment); Radnor , 353 B.R. at 840-41 (finding that monitoring the business, attending board meetings, and accessing confidential information did not give rise to insider status); Atl. Builders Group, Inc. v. Old Line Bank (In re Prince Fredrick Inv., LLC) , 516 B.R. 778, 784-85 (Bankr. D. Md. 2014) (reviewing and approving all payment applications and change orders on a construction project did not give the lender control as such rights sprung from a contract, did not evince any actual control, and were reasonable lender protections).See, e.g. , Exide , 299 B.R. at 743 (finding sufficient allegations of control where lenders dictated timing and scope of bankruptcy and influenced key decision-making of the board of directors, including causing the replacement of the chief financial officer, all for their benefit); Broadstripe , 444 B.R. at 79-80