From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Atkinson v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Dec 14, 1990
570 So. 2d 1147 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1990)

Opinion

No. 90-389.

December 14, 1990.

An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Duval County; R. Hudson Olliff, Judge.

Barbara M. Linthicum, Public Defender, P. Douglas Brinkmeyer, Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Bradley R. Bischoff, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.


We affirm on both issues raised by appellant. As to the constitutional attack upon Section 775.084, Florida Statutes (1988 Supp.), we affirm on the authority of Smith v. State, 567 So.2d 55 (Fla. 2d DCA 1990); Arnold v. State, 566 So.2d 37 (Fla. 2d DCA 1990); Roberts v. State, 559 So.2d 289 (Fla. 2d DCA), dismissed, 564 So.2d 488 (Fla. 1990); King v. State, 557 So.2d 899 (Fla. 5th DCA), review denied, 564 So.2d 1086 (Fla. 1990). Cf. Barber v. State, 564 So.2d 1169 (Fla. 1st DCA 1990).

We also reject appellant's arguments on the second issue relating to alleged procedural irregularities in connection with the imposition of the habitual offender sentence.

AFFIRMED.

SMITH, NIMMONS and ZEHMER, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Atkinson v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Dec 14, 1990
570 So. 2d 1147 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1990)
Case details for

Atkinson v. State

Case Details

Full title:RONALD DAVID ATKINSON, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District

Date published: Dec 14, 1990

Citations

570 So. 2d 1147 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1990)

Citing Cases

Kilo v. State

Appellant also attacks Section 775.084(1)(a) on various constitutional grounds including due process, equal…

Goodman v. State

On appeal he raises two issues: (1) Section 775.084 is violative of Article I, Sections 9 and 16 of the…