From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Atkinson v. Cate

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Sep 13, 2011
No. 2:11-cv-0210 MCE JFM (PC) (E.D. Cal. Sep. 13, 2011)

Opinion

No. 2:11-cv-0210 MCE JFM (PC)

09-13-2011

SCOTT ROBERT ATKINSON, Plaintiff, v. MATTHEW CATE, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this action seeking relief pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983.

On April 22, 2011, the court ordered the United States Marshal to serve process upon defendants in this case. The Marshal was directed to attempt to secure a waiver of service before attempting personal service on defendants. If a waiver of service was not returned within sixty days, the Marshal was directed to effect personal service on the defendant in accordance with the provisions of Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and 28 U.S.C. § 566(c), without prepayment of costs, and to file the return of service with evidence of any attempt to secure a waiver of service and with evidence of all costs subsequently incurred in effecting personal service.

On August 24, 2011, the United States Marshal filed a return of service with a USM-285 form showing total charges of $55.00 for effecting personal service on defendant D. Thomason. The form shows that a waiver of service form was mailed to the defendant on April 22, 2011, and that no response was received.

Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure provides, in pertinent part, as follows:

An individual, corporation, or association that is subject to service under subdivision (e), (f), or (h) and that receives notice of an action in the manner provided in this paragraph has a duty to avoid unnecessary costs of serving the summons . . . .
If a defendant located within the United States fails to comply with a request for waiver made by a plaintiff located within the United States, the court shall impose the costs subsequently incurred in effecting service on the defendant unless good cause for the failure be shown.
Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(d)(2).

The court finds that defendant D. Thomason was given the opportunity required by Rule 4(d)(2) to waive service and has failed to comply with the request.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Within fourteen days from the date of this order defendant D. Thomason shall pay to the United States Marshal the sum of $55.00, unless within that time defendant files a written statement showing good cause for his failure to waive service. The court does not intend to extend this fourteen day period.

2. The Clerk of the Court is directed to serve a copy of this order on the U.S. Marshal.

____________

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

12

atki0210.taxcost(4)


Summaries of

Atkinson v. Cate

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Sep 13, 2011
No. 2:11-cv-0210 MCE JFM (PC) (E.D. Cal. Sep. 13, 2011)
Case details for

Atkinson v. Cate

Case Details

Full title:SCOTT ROBERT ATKINSON, Plaintiff, v. MATTHEW CATE, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Sep 13, 2011

Citations

No. 2:11-cv-0210 MCE JFM (PC) (E.D. Cal. Sep. 13, 2011)