From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Atkinson v. Astrue

United States District Court, D. Colorado
Sep 22, 2009
Civil Action No. 08-cv-01773-CMA (D. Colo. Sep. 22, 2009)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 08-cv-01773-CMA.

September 22, 2009


ORDER GRANTING LEAVE TO PROCEED ON APPEAL IN FORMA PAUPERIS AND DENYING FREE TRANSCRIPT


Plaintiff submitted a Notice of Appeal on August 20, 2009. On August 25, 2009, the Court entered a Memorandum allowing Plaintiff to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal.

However, the Court finds that this appeal does not present a substantial question, i.e., a significant issue that is unique, unusual or reasonably debatable. Therefore, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 753(f), a free transcript will not be provided to Plaintiff. Accordingly, it is

ORDERED that Plaintiff will not be provided with a free transcript because the Court finds that this appeal does not present a substantial question. Plaintiff may pay the estimated transcript fee in advance or make his own arrangements with the court reporter to pay for the cost of any transcript.


Summaries of

Atkinson v. Astrue

United States District Court, D. Colorado
Sep 22, 2009
Civil Action No. 08-cv-01773-CMA (D. Colo. Sep. 22, 2009)
Case details for

Atkinson v. Astrue

Case Details

Full title:MICHAEL P. ATKINSON, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of…

Court:United States District Court, D. Colorado

Date published: Sep 22, 2009

Citations

Civil Action No. 08-cv-01773-CMA (D. Colo. Sep. 22, 2009)