From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Atkins v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District
Jun 24, 2003
108 S.W.3d 194 (Mo. Ct. App. 2003)

Opinion

No. WD 61078

June 24, 2003

Appeal from the Circuit Court of Jackson County, Missouri, The Honorable Charles E. Atwell, Judge.

Andrew A. Schroeder, Appellate Defender, Kansas City, MO, for Appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Attorney General, Charnette D. Douglass, Assistant Attorney General, Jefferson City, MO, for Respondent.

Before Howard, P.J., and Lowenstein and Hardwick, JJ.


Order


Darryl D. Atkins appeals from the denial of his Rule 24.035 motion for postconviction relief following an evidentiary hearing. In his sole point on appeal, Atkins alleges the motion court clearly erred in denying his Rule 24.035 motion because he was denied effective assistance of counsel in that counsel misled him into pleading guilty. As a result, Atkins argues his guilty pleas were not knowing, intelligent, and voluntary.

Affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).


Summaries of

Atkins v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District
Jun 24, 2003
108 S.W.3d 194 (Mo. Ct. App. 2003)
Case details for

Atkins v. State

Case Details

Full title:DARRYL D. ATKINS, Appellant, v. STATE OF MISSOURI, Respondent

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District

Date published: Jun 24, 2003

Citations

108 S.W.3d 194 (Mo. Ct. App. 2003)