From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Atkins v. Page

Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Apr 25, 1922
208 P. 824 (Okla. 1922)

Opinion

No. 12864

Opinion Filed April 25, 1922.

(Syllabus.)

Appeal and Error — Moot Question — Dismissal.

When the question presented by an appeal has become moot, the appeal will be dismissed.

Error from District Court, Creek County; Lucien B. Wright, Judge.

Exceptions by Sallie Atkins to supersedeas bond given by Charles Page et al. overruled, and she brings error. Dismissed.

Gibson Hull, J.D. Sims, Harry G. Davis, McDougal, Lytle, Allen Pryor, and Rice Lyons, for plaintiff in error.

Stuart, Sharp Cruce, West, Sherman, Davidson Moore, H.O. Bland, Paul P. Pinkerton, and Rice Lyons, for defendants in error.


Sallie Atkins, plaintiff in error, prosecutes this appeal to reverse an order of the district court overruling exceptions to a supersedeas bond given by Charles Page et al., superseding the judgment rendered in favor of Sallie Atkins in an action in the district court of Creek county wherein Sallie Atkins was plaintiff and Charles Page et al. were defendants.

This court has, this day, in an opinion filed in cause No. 12769, reversed the judgment of the district court and directed that judgment be entered in favor of the defendants in the cause. In this situation, the questions involved in this appeal have become moot and the appeal will be dismissed. It is so ordered.

HARRISON, C. J., PITCHFORD, V. C. J., and JOHNSON, MILLER, and NICHOLSON, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Atkins v. Page

Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Apr 25, 1922
208 P. 824 (Okla. 1922)
Case details for

Atkins v. Page

Case Details

Full title:ATKINS v. PAGE et al

Court:Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Date published: Apr 25, 1922

Citations

208 P. 824 (Okla. 1922)
86 Okla. 308

Citing Cases

Skouby v. Board of Education

"Under the above state of facts, the question involved has become moot. In such cases this court will dismiss…