From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Atkins v. McDonough

United States District Court, N.D. Florida, Pensacola Division
Jul 13, 2006
Case No. 3:06cv87/MCR/EMT (N.D. Fla. Jul. 13, 2006)

Opinion

Case No. 3:06cv87/MCR/EMT.

July 13, 2006


ORDER


This cause is before the court on Petitioner's Motion for Stay and Abeyance (Doc. 14). Petitioner requests that the court stay his federal habeas petition to allow him to present his unexhausted claims to the state court and then return to federal court for review of his perfected petition. Petitioner citesRhines v. Weber, 544 U.S. 269, 125 S. Ct. 1528, 161 L. Ed. 2d (2005) in support of his motion.

In Rhines, the Supreme Court held that the district court should stay, rather than dismiss, a "mixed" petition if "the petitioner had good cause for his failure to exhaust, his unexhausted claims are potentially meritorious, and there is no indication that the petitioner engaged in intentionally dilatory litigation tactics." 544 U.S. at 278. In the instant case, Petitioner has stated no reason for his failure to exhaust, thus he has failed to satisfy the "good cause" prong of the Rhines standard.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED:

Petitioner's Motion for Stay and Abeyance (Doc. 14) is DENIED.

DONE AND ORDERED.


Summaries of

Atkins v. McDonough

United States District Court, N.D. Florida, Pensacola Division
Jul 13, 2006
Case No. 3:06cv87/MCR/EMT (N.D. Fla. Jul. 13, 2006)
Case details for

Atkins v. McDonough

Case Details

Full title:TERENCE C. ATKINS, Petitioner, v. JAMES R. McDONOUGH, Respondent

Court:United States District Court, N.D. Florida, Pensacola Division

Date published: Jul 13, 2006

Citations

Case No. 3:06cv87/MCR/EMT (N.D. Fla. Jul. 13, 2006)