From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Atienza v. Wells Fargo

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Nov 23, 2011
No. C-11-3153 EMC (N.D. Cal. Nov. 23, 2011)

Opinion

No. C-11-3153 EMC

11-23-2011

ALICIA G. ATIENZA, et al., Plaintiffs, v. WELLS FARGO, et al., Defendants.


ORDER DISMISSING CASE

On October 27, 2011, the Court issued an Order to Show Cause why this case should not be dismissed without prejudice against U.S. Bancorp for failure to serve pursuant to Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Docket No. 19. Rule 4(m) provides that "[i]f a defendant is not served within 120 days after the complaint is filed, the court - on motion or on its own after notice to the plaintiff - must dismiss the action without prejudice against that defendant." The Court gave notice to Plaintiffs that absent proof of service or good cause, the Court would dismiss the action.

Plaintiffs were instructed to file their response to the Court's Order to Show Cause no later than November 10, 2011. Plaintiffs have failed to respond. Accordingly, the Court hereby DISMISSES the action as against Defendant U.S. Bancorp without prejudice.

Because U.S. Bancorp is the only defendant remaining in this action, the Clerk shall enter judgment and close the file.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

EDWARD M. CHEN

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Atienza v. Wells Fargo

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Nov 23, 2011
No. C-11-3153 EMC (N.D. Cal. Nov. 23, 2011)
Case details for

Atienza v. Wells Fargo

Case Details

Full title:ALICIA G. ATIENZA, et al., Plaintiffs, v. WELLS FARGO, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Nov 23, 2011

Citations

No. C-11-3153 EMC (N.D. Cal. Nov. 23, 2011)