From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Atencio v. Soopers

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Dec 7, 2012
Civil Action No. 11-cv-02195-PAB-MEH (D. Colo. Dec. 7, 2012)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 11-cv-02195-PAB-MEH

12-07-2012

MARSHA ATENCIO, Plaintiff, v. KING SOOPERS, ANN PIERCE, SCOTT BRINSON, NASH FORACI, and CHARLES BIGLEN, Defendants.


FINAL JUDGMENT

In accordance with the orders filed during the pendency of this case, and pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 58(a), the following Final Judgment is hereby entered.

Pursuant to the Order of Judge Philip A. Brimmer entered on December 5, 2012 it is

ORDERED that the Motion for Summary Judgment and Incorporated Brief [Docket No. 17] is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. It is

FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff's first and fourth claims for relief are dismissed without prejudice as preempted by § 301 of the Labor Management Relations Act, 29 U.S.C. § 185 et seq. It is

FURTHER ORDERED that the case is remanded to the District Court for the City and County of Denver, where it was originally filed as Civil Action 2011 CV 4619. It is

FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant King Soopers, Ann Pierce, Scott Brinson, Nash Foraci, and Charles Biglen are AWARDED their costs, to be taxed by the Clerk of the Court pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(d)(1) and D.C.COLO.LCivR 54.1.

Dated at Denver, Colorado this 7th day of December, 2012.

FOR THE COURT:

JEFFREY P. COLWELL, CLERK

By: ______________

Edward P. Butler

Deputy Clerk


Summaries of

Atencio v. Soopers

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Dec 7, 2012
Civil Action No. 11-cv-02195-PAB-MEH (D. Colo. Dec. 7, 2012)
Case details for

Atencio v. Soopers

Case Details

Full title:MARSHA ATENCIO, Plaintiff, v. KING SOOPERS, ANN PIERCE, SCOTT BRINSON…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Date published: Dec 7, 2012

Citations

Civil Action No. 11-cv-02195-PAB-MEH (D. Colo. Dec. 7, 2012)