Opinion
22-CV-0853 (LTS)
07-22-2022
NADIRE ATAS, Plaintiff, v. THE NEW YORK TIMES COMPANY, et al., Defendants.
ORDER
LAURA TAYLOR SWAIN, CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Plaintiff brings this action pro se. By order dated May 31, 2022, the Court dismissed Plaintiff's complaint, but granted her 30 days' leave to file an amended complaint of which the Court has subject matter jurisdiction. On July 1, 2022, the Court granted Plaintiff an additional 30 days to comply. On July 22, 2022, the Court received a second request from Plaintiff for an extension of time to file her amended complaint. (ECF 11.)
The Court grants Plaintiff's request for another extension of time. Plaintiff is directed to file an amended complaint within 30 days of the date of this order. If Plaintiff fails to comply within the time allowed, and she cannot show good cause to excuse such failure, this action will be dismissed for lack of subject matter jurisdiction.
CONCLUSION
The Court grants Plaintiff's request for another extension of time to file an amended complaint. (ECF 11.) Plaintiff is directed to file an amended complaint within 30 days of the date of this order.
The Court certifies under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith, and therefore in forma pauperis status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. Cf. Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962) (holding that an appellant demonstrates good faith when he seeks review of a nonfrivolous issue).
SO ORDERED.