From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Asturias v. Smith

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA MIDDLE DIVISION
Aug 17, 2016
Case No. 4:15-cv-00176-CLS-SGC (N.D. Ala. Aug. 17, 2016)

Opinion

Case No. 4:15-cv-00176-CLS-SGC

08-17-2016

EDUARDO ASTURIAS, Plaintiff, v. GERALD SMITH, et al., Defendants.


MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

The magistrate judge entered a report on June 22, 2016, recommending that the federal claims in this action be dismissed without prejudice for failing to state a claim upon which relief can be granted, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(1), and that any state law claims asserted in the complaint be dismissed without prejudice pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1367(c)(3). (Doc. 17). Although the magistrate judge advised plaintiff of his right to file specific written objections within fourteen (14) days, no objections have been received by the court.

Having carefully reviewed and considered de novo all the materials in the court file, including the report and recommendation, the magistrate judge's report is hereby ADOPTED, and the recommendation is ACCEPTED. Therefore, in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(1), plaintiff's federal claims are due to be dismissed without prejudice for failing to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. Additionally, plaintiff's state law claims asserted in the complaint are due to be dismissed without prejudice pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1367(c)(3). A Final Judgment will be entered.

DONE this 17th day of August, 2016.

/s/_________

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Asturias v. Smith

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA MIDDLE DIVISION
Aug 17, 2016
Case No. 4:15-cv-00176-CLS-SGC (N.D. Ala. Aug. 17, 2016)
Case details for

Asturias v. Smith

Case Details

Full title:EDUARDO ASTURIAS, Plaintiff, v. GERALD SMITH, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA MIDDLE DIVISION

Date published: Aug 17, 2016

Citations

Case No. 4:15-cv-00176-CLS-SGC (N.D. Ala. Aug. 17, 2016)