From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Astudillo v. MV Transp., Inc.

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department
Feb 10, 2016
136 A.D.3d 721 (N.Y. App. Div. 2016)

Opinion

2014-04393

02-10-2016

Alicia Astudillo, et al., appellants, v. MV Transportation, Inc., et al., defendants.

Mallilo & Grossman, Flushing, NY (Joshua M. Lockamy of counsel), for appellants. Cheven Keely & Hatziz, New York, NY (William B. Stock of counsel), for defendants Gowkarran Lallbachan and Asiq Rashid (no brief filed).


JOHN M. LEVENTHAL JEFFREY A. COHEN HECTOR D. LASALLE, JJ. (Index No. 14603/07)

Mallilo & Grossman, Flushing, NY (Joshua M. Lockamy of counsel), for appellants.

Cheven Keely & Hatziz, New York, NY (William B. Stock of counsel), for defendants Gowkarran Lallbachan and Asiq Rashid (no brief filed).

DECISION & ORDER

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiffs appeal, by permission, from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Flug, J.), entered April 8, 2014, which declined to accept a settlement between the plaintiff Alicia Astudillo and the defendants MV Transportation, Inc., New York City Transit Authority, and Walkins Ferdinand, and declined to permit the action to proceed to a trial on the claims asserted by the plaintiff Nancy Linares only.

ORDERED that the order is reversed, on the law, without costs or disbursements, and the matter is remitted to the Supreme Court, Queens County, for further proceedings consistent herewith.

In this personal injury action stemming from a motor vehicle accident, the plaintiff Alicia Astudillo and the defendants MV Transportation, Inc., New York City Transit Authority, and Walkins Ferdinand reached a settlement with regard to Astudillo's claims. Astudillo also withdrew her claims against the defendants Gowkarran Lallbachan and Asiq Rashid. The parties appeared before the Supreme Court, advising it of their intention to settle the action as to Astudillo, and to proceed to a trial on the claims asserted by the plaintiff Nancy Linares only. The court declined to accept the settlement, and to permit the action to proceed to a trial on the claims asserted by the plaintiff Nancy Linares only. The plaintiffs appeal.

" [P]arties to a civil dispute are free to chart their own litigation course and, in so doing, they may stipulate away statutory, and even constitutional rights'" (Matter of Kaczor v Kaczor, 101 AD3d at 1404-1405, quoting Matter of Mallinckrodt Med. v Assessor of Town of Argyle, 292 AD2d 721, 722). The subject stipulation of settlement was made after negotiations among counsel for the respective parties, and the litigants agreed to its terms. In consenting to the stipulation, these parties fashioned the basis upon which their particular controversy would be resolved by providing for the termination of the action with respect to Astudillo and the continuation of the action with respect to Linares (see Mitchell v New York Hosp., 61 NY2d 208, 214; Cullen v Naples, 31 NY2d 818, 820; Matter Kaczor v Kaczor, 101 AD3d 1403, 1404-1405). Contrary to the Supreme Court's observations, the proposed settlement raised no issues regarding law of the case or a conflict of interest. Under the circumstances, the court erred in rejecting the stipulation, and we remit the matter to the Supreme Court, Queens County, so that it may accept the stipulation and permit the claims of Linares to proceed to trial.

MASTRO, J.P., LEVENTHAL, COHEN and LASALLE, JJ., concur. ENTER:

Aprilanne Agostino

Clerk of the Court


Summaries of

Astudillo v. MV Transp., Inc.

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department
Feb 10, 2016
136 A.D.3d 721 (N.Y. App. Div. 2016)
Case details for

Astudillo v. MV Transp., Inc.

Case Details

Full title:Alicia Astudillo, et al., appellants, v. MV Transportation, Inc., et al.…

Court:SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department

Date published: Feb 10, 2016

Citations

136 A.D.3d 721 (N.Y. App. Div. 2016)
2016 N.Y. Slip Op. 915
25 N.Y.S.3d 289

Citing Cases

Lantigua v. Goldstein

As a general matter, the parties to a civil dispute are free to chart their own litigation course, and they…

Wunderlich v. Liberty Meadows, LLC

However, the courts, on the other hand recognized that "parties to a civil dispute are free to chart their…