From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Astrella v. Schrader

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department.
May 24, 1951
200 Misc. 245 (N.Y. App. Term 1951)

Opinion

05-24-1951

Vito Astrella, Respondent, v. John W. Schrader, Appellant.


Thomas R. Evans and Herbert F. Hastings, Jr., for appellant. Anthony J. Dell' Aquila and Sylvester J. Garamella for respondent. HOFSTADTER, EDER and SCHREIBER, JJ., concur. Per Curiam. The refusal of the Trial Judge to take judicial notice of the police department rules and regulations and city ordinances pertaining to vehicular traffic and declination to instruct the jury with respect thereto, when requested, was error. The ground of refusal and declination to charge was that formal proof of rules and regulations and of the city ordinances was not made. No such proof was required (L. 1917, ch. 382; Administrative Code of City of New York, § 982-8.0, subd. [a]). The judgment should be reversed and new trial ordered, with $30 costs to appellant to abide the event. Judgment reversed, etc.


Summaries of

Astrella v. Schrader

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department.
May 24, 1951
200 Misc. 245 (N.Y. App. Term 1951)
Case details for

Astrella v. Schrader

Case Details

Full title:Vito Astrella, Respondent,v.John W. Schrader, Appellant.

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department.

Date published: May 24, 1951

Citations

200 Misc. 245 (N.Y. App. Term 1951)