Summary
In Astor v. L'Amoreux, (4 Seld. 107,) this court held that the general term erred in reversing a judgment in favor of the plaintiff, and ordering judgment for the defendant.
Summary of this case from Beach v. CookeOpinion
March Term, 1853
J. MILLER for appellant.
J.A. L'AMOREUX respondent in person.
The superior court erred in reversing the judgment recovered at the circuit, and ordering a final judgment for the defendant upon a case made at the trial. It should have ordered a new trial, which was all it was authorized to do.
Judgment reversed and new trial ordered.