From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Associated Fish Products Co. v. Hussey

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine. Kennebec
Feb 15, 1950
71 A.2d 519 (Me. 1950)

Opinion

Opinion, February 15, 1950.

Insurance. Brokers.

McLean, Southard and Hunt, for plaintiff.

Michael Pilot, Ernest L. Goodspeed, Sr., for defendant.

SITTING: MURCHIE, C.J., THAXTER, FELLOWS, MERRILL, NULTY, WILLIAMSON JJ.


This action on the case is before us on report. The declaration contains five counts, the first three alleging that the defendant, an insurance broker, negligently failed to keep certain property of the plaintiff protected by insurance policies or binders as the defendant had agreed to do, that a fire resulted, and that, in consequence thereof and of such negligent failure of the defendant, the plaintiff suffered loss. The last two counts are to the same general effect, except that it is alleged that the defendant's neglect with respect to the failure to insure was wilful and fraudulent. The plea was the general issue.

Under the terms of a letter to the plaintiff's president dated May 27, 1948, the defendant did bind this insurance. The defendant contends that these binders were cancelled by a telephone conversation, confirmed immediately by a letter from the defendant to the plaintiff's president on July 8, 1948. The fire occurred July 17th following. The plaintiff's president admits that he did talk with the defendant on July 8th and that the purpose of the conversation was to assure himself that the binders were in force and he denies that he ever received the letter of July 8th. The defendant's testimony as to the purport of the conversation is diametrically opposed and he is emphatic in his statement that he wrote and mailed the letter.

Whether the story of the plaintiff's president is correct, or that of the defendant, is the only issue in the case, and that is a question of fact not of law. There is no issue of law before this court and this case is not properly here on report. Apparently there is raised a simple issue of veracity between Mr. Wight, the president of the plaintiff, and the defendant. The triers of the facts who can see and hear the witnesses should decide this, not this court sitting as a court of law which has before it nothing but the printed record. The case should be remanded to be heard at nisi prius.

Report discharged.


Summaries of

Associated Fish Products Co. v. Hussey

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine. Kennebec
Feb 15, 1950
71 A.2d 519 (Me. 1950)
Case details for

Associated Fish Products Co. v. Hussey

Case Details

Full title:ASSOCIATED FISH PRODUCTS COMPANY vs. PHIL R. HUSSEY

Court:Supreme Judicial Court of Maine. Kennebec

Date published: Feb 15, 1950

Citations

71 A.2d 519 (Me. 1950)
71 A.2d 519

Citing Cases

Hand, Admr. v. Nickerson

When this court has heretofore stated in opinions that no question of law was or that only questions of fact…

Burton v. Thompson

It is apparent that final disposition of the case at bar does not turn upon the allowance or denial of the…