striking down Pennsylvania's rule requiring prosecutors to obtain prior judicial approval before issuing a subpoena to an attorney to testify before the grand jury concerning a past or present client
Summary of this case from U.S. v. Colorado Supreme CourtNo. 92-709.
March 22, 1993.
C.A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 966 F. 2d 492.
striking down Pennsylvania's rule requiring prosecutors to obtain prior judicial approval before issuing a subpoena to an attorney to testify before the grand jury concerning a past or present client
Summary of this case from U.S. v. Colorado Supreme Courtlisting the jurisdictions that have adopted National Parks
Summary of this case from Sublette Cty. Rural Health Care v. MileyFull title:ASSOCIATED BUILDERS CONTRACTORS, INC., ET AL. v. CITY OF SEWARD ET AL
Court:U.S.
Date published: Mar 22, 1993
General Building Contractors of New York State,Inc. v. Dormitory Authority of the State of New York,620…
McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. U.S.E.E.O.C.17(b)-(c), FOIA exemptions 4 and 6, the Trade Secrets Act, 18 U.S.C. § 1905, the attorney-client privilege,…