From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Aspenlind v. Spartan Mortg. Servs.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jan 18, 2012
No. 2:11-cv-00366 MCE GGH PS (E.D. Cal. Jan. 18, 2012)

Opinion

No. 2:11-cv-00366 MCE GGH PS

01-18-2012

LARS ASPENLIND, Plaintiff, v. SPARTAN MORTGAGE SERVICES, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

On December 14, 2011, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on the parties and which contained notice that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. No objections were filed.

Accordingly, the Court presumes any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United States, 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge's conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. See Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir. 1983).

The Court has reviewed the applicable legal standards and, good cause appearing, concludes that it is appropriate to adopt the Findings and Recommendations in full.

Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that the Findings and Recommendations filed December 14, 2011, are ADOPTED and defendants Kindopp, North American Title, and California Moving Company are DISMISSED without prejudice. See Local Rule 11-110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).

____________________________

MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Aspenlind v. Spartan Mortg. Servs.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jan 18, 2012
No. 2:11-cv-00366 MCE GGH PS (E.D. Cal. Jan. 18, 2012)
Case details for

Aspenlind v. Spartan Mortg. Servs.

Case Details

Full title:LARS ASPENLIND, Plaintiff, v. SPARTAN MORTGAGE SERVICES, et al.…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Jan 18, 2012

Citations

No. 2:11-cv-00366 MCE GGH PS (E.D. Cal. Jan. 18, 2012)