From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Asmus v. Asmus

Court of Errors and Appeals
Apr 21, 1939
5 A.2d 777 (N.J. 1939)

Opinion

Argued February term, 1939.

Decided April 21st, 1939.

Accounting in the estates in question, as stated in the final decree appealed from, affirmed. Counsel fees and receiver's fee reduced as excessive.

On appeal from the court of chancery.

Messrs. Huckin Huckin ( Mr. Thomas J. Huckin), for Edward R. Asmus. Messrs. Isaacs Gunther ( Mr. Morton Isaacs), for Adolph E. Asmus, individually, c.

Mr. Dominick J. Marchitto and Mr. John Warren, for Grover E. Asmus et al.

Messrs. Warren Rae ( Mr. John Warren), for Grover E. Asmus and William M. Schultz, executors, c.


These cases involve an accounting in the estate of Ernst G. Asmus, deceased, and Josephine M. Asmus, deceased. Ernst G. Asmus died testate December 17th, 1903. By his will, he provided that his wife should have a life estate in his property real and personal during the term of her natural life, if she so long remained his widow with remainder to his three sons, subject to gifts over in the event of the death of any of them intestate. In the eleventh clause he provided that the gift for his wife was in addition to her right of dower in the real estate of which he died seized.

The will of Ernst G. Asmus was construed in a decision by Vice-Chancellor Lewis. Asmus v. Asmus, 122 N.J. Eq. 485. The matter of accounting was transferred to Vice-Chancellor Egan, who advised the final decree now appealed from without opinion.

The complainant, Edward R. Asmus, a son and remainderman, appeals from the accounting as stated by the learned vice-chancellor. We have carefully examined the record, the arguments of counsel and the authorities cited, and we are of the opinion that there is no merit in the contention made.

The defendants, Adolph E. Asmus, individually and as surviving executor, Grover E. Asmus, Josephine Asmus and Grover E. Asmus, as guardian ad litem of certain infants, also appeal from the final decree.

We have carefully examined the record and the arguments of counsel and conclude that they possess no merit, save that we deem an award of $7,500 to Messrs. Huckin Huckin, counsel for the appellant Edward R. Asmus, excessive and that it should be reduced to $5,000. And that the award to Messrs. Isaacs Gunther, counsel for Adolph E. Asmus, of $3,500 excessive and should be reduced to $3,000, and that the award of $3,500 to Mr. John Warren, counsel for Grover E. Asmus and William M. Schultz, executors, excessive and should be reduced to $3,000, and that the award of $3,660.70 to Mr. Frank B. Plympton, as receiver, excessive and should be reduced to $2,000.

The decree, except in the particulars mentioned, will be affirmed, but without costs to any of the appellants.

For modification — THE CHIEF-JUSTICE, PARKER, CASE, BODINE, DONGES, HEHER, PERSKIE, PORTER, HETFIELD, DEAR, WELLS, WOLFSKEIL, RAFFERTY, JJ. 13.


Summaries of

Asmus v. Asmus

Court of Errors and Appeals
Apr 21, 1939
5 A.2d 777 (N.J. 1939)
Case details for

Asmus v. Asmus

Case Details

Full title:EDWARD R. ASMUS, complainant, respondent and appellant, v. ADOLPH E…

Court:Court of Errors and Appeals

Date published: Apr 21, 1939

Citations

5 A.2d 777 (N.J. 1939)
5 A.2d 777

Citing Cases

Kruse v. Meissner

He contends that under the provisions of the codicil he is not required to pay any of the operating or…