From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

A.S.L. Enterprises v. Venus Laboratories

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Aug 2, 1999
264 A.D.2d 372 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)

Opinion

August 2, 1999.

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Joseph, J.).


Ordered that the order is reversed, as a matter of discretion, with costs, the motion is granted, and the defendants are granted leave to serve and file a jury demand within 20 days after service upon them of a copy of this decision and order with notice of entry.

In view of the absence of prejudice to the plaintiffs, the fact that the defendants had no intention of waiving a jury trial, and their prompt application to be relieved of their default, it was an improvident exercise of discretion for the Supreme Court to have denied the defendants' motion for leave to serve and file a jury demand ( see, CPLR 4102 [a]; Breezy Point Coop. v. Young, 234 A.D.2d 409, 410; Lane v. Marshall, 89 A.D.2d 579; Calspan Corp. v. Fingermatrix, Inc., 84 A.D.2d 826).

Mangano, P. J., Santucci, Krausman, Florio and H. Miller, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

A.S.L. Enterprises v. Venus Laboratories

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Aug 2, 1999
264 A.D.2d 372 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)
Case details for

A.S.L. Enterprises v. Venus Laboratories

Case Details

Full title:A.S.L. ENTERPRISES, INC., et al., Respondents, v. VENUS LABORATORIES…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Aug 2, 1999

Citations

264 A.D.2d 372 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)
694 N.Y.S.2d 686

Citing Cases

TJS of New York, Inc. v. Koppelman

However, CPLR 4102(e) also provides that, a "court may relieve a party from the effect of failing to comply…

Shock v. Costco Wholesale Corp.

Consequently, the defendants' motion to file a late jury demand nunc pro tunc is granted. See, Schwartz v.…