From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Asiatic Co. (USA), Inc. v. Expeditors International of Washington, Inc.

Oregon Court of Appeals
Aug 28, 2002
52 P.3d 1112 (Or. Ct. App. 2002)

Opinion

9901-00510; A111483

Argued and submitted August 5, 2002.

Filed: August 28, 2002

Appeal from Circuit Court, Multnomah County. Sidney A. Galton, Judge.

Thomas F. Spaulding argued the cause for appellant. With him on the briefs was Spaulding Cox Schaeffer, LLP.

Frank V. Langfitt, III, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the briefs were Lori Irish Bauman and Ater Wynne LLP.

Before KISTLER, Presiding Judge, DEITS, Chief Judge, and BREWER, Judge.


PER CURIAM

Award of costs in supplemental judgment reversed and remanded; otherwise affirmed.


Plaintiff, an importer, appeals from a judgment dismissing its claims for damages against defendant, a customs broker and freight forwarder, for various commercial torts and granting defendant's counterclaim for freight charges. We reverse the trial court's award of costs and otherwise affirm.

The governing agreement between the parties provided that, if defendant were successful in any litigation, plaintiff would pay defendant's "expenses of collection and/or litigation, including a reasonable attorney fee[.]" Based on that provision, the trial court entered a supplemental judgment for attorney fees and for costs that included court reporter fees and other items that are not included in the costs that ORCP 68 A(2) permits a prevailing party to recover. In Malot v. Hadley, 102 Or. App. 336, 342, 794 P.2d 833 (1990), we construed an agreement to pay the prevailing party's reasonable "expenses," in the absence of language showing a contrary intent, as meaning "those costs and disbursements provided for by statute or rule at the time the cost bill was submitted." Nothing in the agreement in this case leads us to construe "expenses of collection and/or litigation" differently. Defendant is entitled to recover only those costs that the applicable statutes or rules provide. Cf. Robinowitz v. Pozzi, 127 Or. App. 464, 470-71, 872 P.2d 993, rev den 320 Or. 109 (1994) (some separately billed expenses may be included in attorney fees).

Award of costs in supplemental judgment reversed and remanded; otherwise affirmed.


Summaries of

Asiatic Co. (USA), Inc. v. Expeditors International of Washington, Inc.

Oregon Court of Appeals
Aug 28, 2002
52 P.3d 1112 (Or. Ct. App. 2002)
Case details for

Asiatic Co. (USA), Inc. v. Expeditors International of Washington, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:ASIATIC COMPANY (USA), INC., a Texas corporation, Appellant, v. EXPEDITORS…

Court:Oregon Court of Appeals

Date published: Aug 28, 2002

Citations

52 P.3d 1112 (Or. Ct. App. 2002)
52 P.3d 1112

Citing Cases

Greenwood Products v. Greenwood Forest Products

"The promissory notes on which defendants prevailed provided that the prevailing party `shall be entitled to…