From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ashton v. Goldberg

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 22, 1994
201 A.D.2d 601 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)

Opinion

February 22, 1994

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Robbins, J.).


Ordered that the appeal from the order dated September 11, 1991, is dismissed, with costs.

Contrary to the plaintiff's contention, the court properly treated his motion to "renew or reargue", dated June 4, 1991, as one for reargument (see, Gurwicz v. Greenberg, 166 A.D.2d 303; McKay v. H.I.P. of Greater N.Y., 163 A.D.2d 280). Since no appeal lies from an order denying reargument, the appeal from the order dated September 11, 1991, is dismissed. Bracken, J.P., Balletta, O'Brien and Pizzuto, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Ashton v. Goldberg

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 22, 1994
201 A.D.2d 601 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
Case details for

Ashton v. Goldberg

Case Details

Full title:MICHAEL ASHTON, Appellant, v. MORRIS M. GOLDBERG, P.C., et al., Respondents

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Feb 22, 1994

Citations

201 A.D.2d 601 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
612 N.Y.S.2d 866

Citing Cases

Thein v. Mamaroneck Union Free School District

The motion is actually one for reargument only since it was not based on new facts unavailable at the time of…