From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ashton v. Goldberg

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 22, 1994
201 A.D.2d 602 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)

Opinion

February 22, 1994

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Robbins, J.).


Upon the papers filed upon renewal of the cross motion and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it is

Ordered that the renewed cross motion is granted and the appeal is dismissed, without costs or disbursements.

We agree with the respondents' contention that the plaintiff's appeal from the order dated January 11, 1991, must be dismissed as untimely taken. The record indicates that the respondents mailed the plaintiff a copy of that order with notice of entry on January 21, 1991. Therefore, the plaintiff's notice of appeal, dated June 3, 1991, was untimely (see, CPLR 5513). Bracken, J.P., Sullivan, Balletta and Copertino, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Ashton v. Goldberg

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 22, 1994
201 A.D.2d 602 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
Case details for

Ashton v. Goldberg

Case Details

Full title:MICHAEL ASHTON, Appellant, v. MORRIS M. GOLDBERG, P.C., et al., Respondents

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Feb 22, 1994

Citations

201 A.D.2d 602 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
612 N.Y.S.2d 866