Ashton al. v. Al Qaeda Islamic Army (In re Terrorist Attacks on Sept. 11, 2001)

Full title: In re TERRORIST ATTACKS ON SEPTEMBER 11, 2001

Court: United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: Jan 8, 2024

03-MD-01570 (GBD)(SN) (S.D.N.Y. Jan. 8, 2024)

Opinion

03-MD-01570 (GBD)(SN)

01-08-2024

In re TERRORIST ATTACKS ON SEPTEMBER 11, 2001

SARAH NETBURN, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE:

ORDER

SARAH NETBURN, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE:

The motion at ECF No. 9384¹ was resolved by ECF No. 9389. Accordingly, the Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to close the related motions in four member cases:

1 Unless otherwise noted, all ECF numbers refer to the main MDL docket, No. 03-md-01570.

• Ashton, et al. v. Al Qaeda Islamic Army, et al., No. 02-cv-06977, ECF No. 1998;

• Havlish, et al. v. Bin Laden, et al., No. 03-cv-09848, ECF No. 704;

• O'Neill, et al. v. The Republic of Iraq, et al., No. 04-cv-01076, ECF No. 778; and

• Burnett, et al. v. The Islamic Republic of Iran, et al., No. 15-cv-09903, ECF No. 666.

The motion at ECF No. 9394 was resolved by ECF No. 9402. Accordingly, the Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to close the related motions in three member cases:

• Ashton, et al. v. Al Qaeda Islamic Army, et al., No. 02-cv-06977, ECF No. 2000;

• O'Neill, et al. v. The Republic of Iraq, et al., No. 04-cv-01076, ECF No. 780; and

• Burnett, et al. v. The Islamic Republic of Iran, et al., No. 15-cv-09903, ECF No. 667.

The motion at ECF No. 9439 was resolved by ECF No. 9443. Accordingly, the Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to close the related motions in 19 member cases:

• O'Neill, et al. v. The Republic of Iraq, et al., No. 04-cv-01076, ECF No. 781;

• Abel, et al. v. Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, No. 18-cv-11880, ECF No. 102;

• Bonomo, et al. v. Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, No. 18-cv-11885, ECF No. 105;

• Cintron-Lugos, et al. v. Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, No. 18-cv-11888, ECF No. 105;

• DeConto, et al. v. Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, No. 18-cv-11904, ECF No. 101;

• Lang, et al. v. Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, No. 18-cv-11926, ECF No. 103;

• Gordenstein, et al. v. Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, No. 18-cv-11941, ECF No. 104;

• Garger, et al. v. Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, No. 18-cv-11950, ECF No. 103;

• Bush, et al. v. Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, No. 18-cv-11964, ECF No. 104;

• Mercer, et al. v. Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, No. 18-cv-11965, ECF No. 101;

• Murray, et al. v. Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, No. 18-cv-11966, ECF No. 101;

• Perez, et al. v. Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, No. 18-cv-11967, ECF No. 101;

• Richards, et al. v. Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, No. 18-cv-11969, ECF No. 101;

• Rooney, et al. v. Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, No. 18-cv-11970, ECF No. 101;

• Spence, et al. v. Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, No. 18-cv-11971, ECF No. 100;

• Aamoth, et al. v. Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, No. 18-cv-12270, ECF No. 107;

• Kincaid, et al. v. Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, No. 18-cv-12273, ECF No. 104;

• Stackpole, et al. v. Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, No. 18-cv-12275, ECF No. 104; and

• Zelmanowitz, et al. v. Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, No. 18-cv-12381, ECF No. 99.

SO ORDERED.