From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ashley v. Wellmaker

United States District Court, Middle District of Georgia
Jan 26, 2024
Civil Action 5:22-cv-214 (MTT) (M.D. Ga. Jan. 26, 2024)

Opinion

Civil Action 5:22-cv-214 (MTT)

01-26-2024

JUSTIN SINCLAIR ASHLEY, Plaintiff, v. WELLMAKER, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

MARC T. TREADWELL, CHIEF JUDGE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT.

Plaintiff Justin Ashley, proceeding pro se, moves for the appointment of counsel. Docs. 49; 52. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(1), “[t]he court may request an attorney to represent any person unable to afford counsel.” Nevertheless, “[a]ppointment of counsel in a civil case is not a constitutional right.” Wahl v. McIver, 773 F.2d 1169, 1174 (11th Cir. 1985). Rather, “it is a privilege that is justified only by exceptional circumstances.” Id. Because Ashley's claims do not present “exceptional circumstances” that would warrant the appointment of counsel, his motions to appoint counsel (Docs. 49; 52) are DENIED.

Moreover, pursuant to the Court's order for pretrial submissions, Ashley is ORDERED to provide to the Court the following by February 15, 2024:

• A list of witnesses Ashley wants to call at trial, and
• A list of documents Ashley will use at trial.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Ashley v. Wellmaker

United States District Court, Middle District of Georgia
Jan 26, 2024
Civil Action 5:22-cv-214 (MTT) (M.D. Ga. Jan. 26, 2024)
Case details for

Ashley v. Wellmaker

Case Details

Full title:JUSTIN SINCLAIR ASHLEY, Plaintiff, v. WELLMAKER, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Middle District of Georgia

Date published: Jan 26, 2024

Citations

Civil Action 5:22-cv-214 (MTT) (M.D. Ga. Jan. 26, 2024)