From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ashley v. Crane

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
Jan 24, 2012
No. 11-CV-10603 (E.D. Mich. Jan. 24, 2012)

Opinion

No. 11-CV-10603

01-24-2012

CARL ASHLEY, Plaintiff, v. DENNIS CRANE, et al., Defendants.


Hon. Gerald E. Rosen


ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT

AND RECOMMENDATION, DISMISSING PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT,

AND DENYING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO AMEND


At a session of said Court, held in

the U.S. Courthouse, Detroit, Michigan

on January 24, 2012


PRESENT: Honorable Gerald E. Rosen

United States District Chief Judge

This Section 1983 prisoner civil rights matter is presently before the Court on the December 7, 2011 Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Laurie J. Michelson recommending that the Court (1) grant the Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6) Motion to Dismiss filed by Laurie Gidley, Michael Mullens and Becky Newman, the only remaining defendants in this action; (2) deny Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to file an amended complaint; and (3) dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint in its entirety, with prejudice. Plaintiff timely filed objections to the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation.

Having reviewed the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, Plaintiff's Objections, and the Court's entire file of this action, the Court has concluded that, for the reasons stated in the Report and Recommendation, Defendants' motion should be granted, Plaintiff's motion should be denied, and this case should, accordingly, be dismissed in its entirety.

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation of December 7, 2011 be, and hereby is, adopted by this Court.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, for the reasons set forth in the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, Defendants' Motion to Dismiss [Dkt. # 13] be, and hereby is, GRANTED.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to Amend [Dkt. # 22] is DENIED.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the "Amended Complaint" [Dkt. # 23]filed by Plaintiff contemporaneously with his Motion for Leave to Amend be STRICKEN from the record.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff's Complaint be, and hereby is, DISMISSED in its entirety with prejudice.

Let Judgment be entered accordingly.

Gerald E. Rosen

Chief Judge, United States District Court
I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was served upon counsel of record on January 24, 2012, by electronic mail and upon Carl Ashley, #136985, Chippewa Correctional Facility, 4269 W. M-80, Kincheloe, MI 49784 by ordinary mail.

Ruth A. Gunther

Case Manager


Summaries of

Ashley v. Crane

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
Jan 24, 2012
No. 11-CV-10603 (E.D. Mich. Jan. 24, 2012)
Case details for

Ashley v. Crane

Case Details

Full title:CARL ASHLEY, Plaintiff, v. DENNIS CRANE, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

Date published: Jan 24, 2012

Citations

No. 11-CV-10603 (E.D. Mich. Jan. 24, 2012)