From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ashley Borough Appeal

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Jan 3, 1944
35 A.2d 74 (Pa. 1944)

Opinion

November 24, 1943.

January 3, 1944.

Eminent domain — Damages — Municipal corporations — Boroughs — Ordinance approving construction of state highway — Effect — Liability for damages — May 21, 1937, P. L. 757.

The enactment by a borough, prior to the passage of the Act of May 21, 1937, P. L. 757, of an ordinance approving the construction of a state highway through the borough and adopting the grades, courses and distances suggested on the maps and plans of the State Highway Department constitutes an exercise of the borough's power of eminent domain and imposes upon it liability for all damages incident to the construction of the improvement.

Argued November 24, 1943.

Before MAXEY, C. J., DREW, LINN, STERN, PATTERSON and STEARNE, JJ.

Appeal, No. 100, Jan. T., 1943, from order of State Mining Commission filed in C. P. Luzerne Co., March T., 1942, No. 460, in re: Appropriation and taking of lands of Glen Alden Coal Company for State Highway Route No. 170, Section 9, in the County of Luzerne. Order affirmed.

Hearing before State Mining Commission, after petition of owner of coal land appropriated for state highway improvement.

Order entered by commission awarding damages to property owner to be paid by borough. Borough appealed.

John C. Phillips, for appellant.

J. H. Oliver, with him Gilbert S. McClintock and Franklin B. Gelder, for appellee, Glen Alden Coal Company.

Thomas C. Evans, with him Phil H. Lewis, Deputy Attorney General, and James H. Duff, Attorney General, for appellee, Department of Highways.


The State Mining Commission, as provided for by the Act of July 3, 1941, P. L. 259, 52 PS section 1501, has determined that the Borough of Ashley is liable for $9,123.80 in damages to Glen Alden Coal Company for coal found necessary to be left in place for the vertical and lateral support of State Highway Route No. 170, Section 9, in the County of Luzerne. From this order of the Commission, the Borough appeals.

In 1934 and 1935 the Borough passed two ordinances and a resolution approving the construction of the State Highway through the Borough, and adopting the grades, courses and distances suggested on the maps and plans of the State Highway Department. The construction of the road, in accordance with the ordinances and plans, constituted a widening and relocation of a Borough street, and the coal for which the coal company claims damages is subjacent to this improvement.

By the passage of the two ordinances the Borough of Ashley, and not the Commonwealth, became liable for all damages incident to the construction of the improvement. The ordinances were, in effect, condemnation ordinances and a manifestation of the borough's power of eminent domain, derived from Article XIV of the General Borough Act of May 4, 1927, P. L. 519, 53 PS section 13421.

Section 10 of the Sproul Act of May 31, 1911, P. L. 468, 36 PS section 101, the first comprehensive law concerning state highways, specifically withheld authority from the Secretary of Highways to interfere with the streets of boroughs. See Fetherolf's Petition, 84 Pa. Super. 514, cited with approval in Blainesburg-West Brownsville Rd., 293 Pa. 173, 142 A. 319, and Westmoreland Chemical Color Co. v. Public Service Commission, 294 Pa. 451, 144 A. 407.

The Act of June 23, 1931, P. L. 920, 36 PS section 376, however, provided that the Secretary of Highways could "change, alter or establish the width, grades or lines" of a State highway within a borough providing he secured the approval of both the Governor of the Commonwealth and the commissioners of the county wherein the borough was located. But in the instant case, the County Commissioners were unwilling to give their unqualified approval and by resolution informed the Department of Highways that they would not assume damages resulting from the necessity of preserving vertical and lateral support.

The Act of May 21, 1937, P. L. 757, 36 PS section 378, gave the Secretary of Highways power, independent of the approval of other officials, to change the existing widths and locations of borough streets and to pay the damages involved in these improvements from the Motor License Fund. The Secretary had no such power prior to this Act and at the time these ordinances were passed in 1934 and 1935. It follows, therefore, that the Borough of Ashley alone had the power to effect the widening and relocation of this street, and by the passage of ordinances adopting the plans for such changes, is responsible in damages for the coal found to be necessary for support of the new highway route. By collaborating with the Highway Department for the purpose of constructing the state route, the Borough did not surrender its power of eminent domain. It cannot escape the liability resulting from the exercise of this power, and must respond to the party injured. Although the construction of the highway was accomplished in pursuance of an agreement between the Commonwealth and the Borough, the latter is not thereby divested of responsibility to the landowners for its exercise of eminent domain.

Order affirmed. Costs to be paid by appellant.


Summaries of

Ashley Borough Appeal

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Jan 3, 1944
35 A.2d 74 (Pa. 1944)
Case details for

Ashley Borough Appeal

Case Details

Full title:Ashley Borough Appeal

Court:Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Date published: Jan 3, 1944

Citations

35 A.2d 74 (Pa. 1944)
35 A.2d 74

Citing Cases

Moyer et ux., v. Commonwealth

4. Where it appeared that plaintiffs' land in a borough had fronted on a State highway which was relocated;…

Henry Shenk Co. v. Erie

Municipalities are so invested by the Act of June 23, 1931, P. L. 932, Art. XXVIII, Sec. 2801 (53 P. S. §…