From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ashford v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District
Nov 26, 1996
934 S.W.2d 37 (Mo. Ct. App. 1996)

Opinion

No. WD 51101

Date: November 26, 1996

APPEAL FROM COLE COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT, THE HONORABLE RALPH J. HASLAG, JUDGE.

James C. Cox, Assistant Appellate Defender, Kansas City, for appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Attorney General, David R. Truman, Assistant Attorney General, Jefferson City, for respondent.

Before Ellis, P.J., Lowenstein and Stith, JJ.


ORDER


Defendant-Appellant Anthony Ashford appeals the trial court's denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief claiming that his attorney was ineffective because he did not file a notice of appeal after the trial judge imposed Mr. Ashford's sentence to run consecutively to, rather than concurrently with, other sentences he was then serving.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal. Finding no reversible error, we affirm the trial court's denial of Mr. Ashford's Rule 29.15 motion. Because a published opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the applicable principles of law would have no precedential value, we affirm by this summary order under Rule 84.16(b). In addition, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion, for their information only, setting forth our reasoning.

Judgment affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).


Summaries of

Ashford v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District
Nov 26, 1996
934 S.W.2d 37 (Mo. Ct. App. 1996)
Case details for

Ashford v. State

Case Details

Full title:ANTHONY ASHFORD, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF MISSOURI, RESPONDENT

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District

Date published: Nov 26, 1996

Citations

934 S.W.2d 37 (Mo. Ct. App. 1996)