From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Asher v. Orth

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Mar 11, 2013
Case No.: 2:08-cv-00914-RCJ-RJJ (D. Nev. Mar. 11, 2013)

Opinion

Case No.: 2:08-cv-00914-RCJ-RJJ

03-11-2013

SCOTT RAY ASHER; KIMBERLY ASHER, Plaintiffs, v. OFFICER. R. ORTH, P#6475; OFFICER G. MCGHIE, P#2883 and OFFICER J. DESTITO, P#4056, Defendants.

Marquis Aurbach Coffing Craig R. Anderson, Esq. Nevada Bar No. 6882 Micah S. Echols, Esq. Nevada Bar No. 8437 Attorneys for Defendants


Marquis Aurbach Coffing
Craig R. Anderson, Esq.
Nevada Bar No. 6882
Micah S. Echols, Esq.
Nevada Bar No. 8437

Attorneys for Defendants

JUDGMENT UPON JURY VERDICT

This case, having been tried before a jury on February 4, 5, 6, and 7, 2013, and the jury unanimously deciding that Defendants Gordon McGhie, Joseph Destito, and Robert Orth had probable cause to both arrest Scott Asher and search his residence based upon the facts presented, the Court now enters Judgment upon the jury verdict.

All of Plaintiffs' claims against all the Defendants in this action have previously been resolved by written order, with the exception of Scott Asher's 42 U.S.C. § 1983 claim alleging Fourth Amendment violations, as well as the alternative claim for attorney fees under 42 U.S.C. § 1988. The Court also specifically held that Plaintiff Kimberly Asher was a party to this case through the duration of trial for the purpose of potentially recovering damages, depending upon the measure of damages, if any, awarded by the jury.

Because the jury has found that Defendants McGhie, Destito, and Orth acted with probable cause for both the arrest and the search of the Asher's residence, the 42 U.S.C. § 1983 claim is dismissed and resolved in favor of Defendants. Since Plaintiffs did not prevail on their 42 U.S.C. § 1983 claim, Plaintiff's 42 U.S.C. § 1988 claim is also hereby dismissed.

Any claim or request for damages made by Plaintiffs Scott Asher and Kimberly Asher that has not previously been specifically itemized in a written order against any of the parties in this action is hereby dismissed.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

_______________

Honorable Robert C. Jones,

Chief Judge, United States District Court,

District of Nevada
Submitted by: MARQUIS AURBACH COFFING By: Micah S. Echols

Craig R. Anderson, Esq.

Nevada Bar No. 6882

Micah S. Echols, Esq.

Nevada Bar No. 8437

10001 Park Run Drive

Las Vegas, Nevada 89145

Attorneys for Defendants


Summaries of

Asher v. Orth

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Mar 11, 2013
Case No.: 2:08-cv-00914-RCJ-RJJ (D. Nev. Mar. 11, 2013)
Case details for

Asher v. Orth

Case Details

Full title:SCOTT RAY ASHER; KIMBERLY ASHER, Plaintiffs, v. OFFICER. R. ORTH, P#6475…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA

Date published: Mar 11, 2013

Citations

Case No.: 2:08-cv-00914-RCJ-RJJ (D. Nev. Mar. 11, 2013)