From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Asher v. Colgate-Palmolive Co.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
May 29, 2013
516 F. App'x 920 (Fed. Cir. 2013)

Opinion

2013-1043

05-29-2013

RANDALL S. ASHER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. COLGATE-PALMOLIVE COMPANY, Defendant-Appellee.

WILLIAM W. COCHRAN, II, Cochran Freund & Yong, of Fort Collins, Colorado and GORDON M. HADFIELD, Fischer & Fischer, LLP, of Fort Collins, Colorado, argued for plaintiff-appellant. On the brief was ERIK G. FISCHER, Erik G. Fischer, P.C., of Fort Collins, Colorado. DAVID K. CALLAHAN, Kirkland & Ellis, LLP, of Chicago, Illinois, argued for defendant-appellee. With him on the brief was JARED BARCENAS.


NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Colorado in No. 10-CV-1468, Judge Marcia S. Krieger.

JUDGMENT

WILLIAM W. COCHRAN, II, Cochran Freund & Yong, of Fort Collins, Colorado and GORDON M. HADFIELD, Fischer & Fischer, LLP, of Fort Collins, Colorado, argued for plaintiff-appellant. On the brief was ERIK G. FISCHER, Erik G. Fischer, P.C., of Fort Collins, Colorado.

DAVID K. CALLAHAN, Kirkland & Ellis, LLP, of Chicago, Illinois, argued for defendant-appellee. With him on the brief was JARED BARCENAS. THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (NEWMAN, PLAGER, and O'MALLEY, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

__________

Jan Horbaly

Clerk


Summaries of

Asher v. Colgate-Palmolive Co.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
May 29, 2013
516 F. App'x 920 (Fed. Cir. 2013)
Case details for

Asher v. Colgate-Palmolive Co.

Case Details

Full title:RANDALL S. ASHER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. COLGATE-PALMOLIVE COMPANY…

Court:United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Date published: May 29, 2013

Citations

516 F. App'x 920 (Fed. Cir. 2013)