From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ash v. Werner Co.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA
Dec 13, 2012
Civil No. 12-1721 (JRT/LIB) (D. Minn. Dec. 13, 2012)

Opinion

Civil No. 12-1721 (JRT/LIB)

12-13-2012

MICHAEL ASH, SHELLY ASH, IN-LAW CONSTRUCTION, Plaintiffs, v. WERNER CO., OLD LADDER CO., MENARD, INC., NEW WERNER HOLDING CO., INC., Defendants,

Daniel Howland, James Lavoie, LINDELL & LAVOIE LLP, for plaintiffs. Michael Meyer, Patrick Burgess, TRIBLER ORPETT & MEYER PC, Robert McCollum, Gregory Duncan, MCCOLLUM, CROWLEY, MOSCHEL & MILLER, for defendants Werner Co., Menard, Inc., and New Werner Holding Co., Inc.


ORDER ADOPTING REPORT

AND RECOMMENDATION

Daniel Howland, James Lavoie, LINDELL & LAVOIE LLP, for plaintiffs.

Michael Meyer, Patrick Burgess, TRIBLER ORPETT & MEYER PC, Robert McCollum, Gregory Duncan, MCCOLLUM, CROWLEY, MOSCHEL & MILLER, for defendants Werner Co., Menard, Inc., and New Werner Holding Co., Inc. Based upon the Report and Recommendation by United States Magistrate Judge Leo I. Brisbois [Docket No.11], along with all the files and records, and no objections to said Recommendation having been filed, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Plaintiff's claims against Old Ladder Co. are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for failure to prosecute. DATED: December 13, 2012
at Minneapolis, Minnesota

____________________

JOHN R. TUNHEIM

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Ash v. Werner Co.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA
Dec 13, 2012
Civil No. 12-1721 (JRT/LIB) (D. Minn. Dec. 13, 2012)
Case details for

Ash v. Werner Co.

Case Details

Full title:MICHAEL ASH, SHELLY ASH, IN-LAW CONSTRUCTION, Plaintiffs, v. WERNER CO.…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA

Date published: Dec 13, 2012

Citations

Civil No. 12-1721 (JRT/LIB) (D. Minn. Dec. 13, 2012)

Citing Cases

Pierce Butler Radiator Corporation v. Luongo

Therefore, it is incumbent upon plaintiff to establish the assumption of the obligations of Sorrentino by…