From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ash v. Deschutes Cnty.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON
Feb 4, 2014
Case No. 6:12 CV 2109-TC (D. Or. Feb. 4, 2014)

Opinion

Case No. 6:12 CV 2109-TC

02-04-2014

PILAR ASH, Plaintiff, v. DESCHUTES COUNTY, DESCHUTES COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE, PAUL GARRISON, CASEY KARPSTEIN, SHANE NELSON, DERRON McMASTER, MICHAEL GILL, DAN BILYEU, JON ASH and JOAH ASH, Defendants.


ORDER

Magistrate Judge Coffin filed his Findings and Recommendation on January 3, 2014. The matter is now before me. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b). No objections have been timely filed. This relieves me of my obligation to give the factual findings de novo review. Lorin Corp. v. Goto & Co., Ltd., 700 F.2d 1202, 1206 (9th Cir. 1982). See also Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir. 1983). Having reviewed the legal principles de novo, I find no error.

THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, I adopt Judge Coffin's Findings and Recommendation.

__________

Ann Aiken, United States District Judge


Summaries of

Ash v. Deschutes Cnty.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON
Feb 4, 2014
Case No. 6:12 CV 2109-TC (D. Or. Feb. 4, 2014)
Case details for

Ash v. Deschutes Cnty.

Case Details

Full title:PILAR ASH, Plaintiff, v. DESCHUTES COUNTY, DESCHUTES COUNTY SHERIFF'S…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON

Date published: Feb 4, 2014

Citations

Case No. 6:12 CV 2109-TC (D. Or. Feb. 4, 2014)