From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Asdale v. International Game Technology

United States District Court, D. Nevada
Jun 14, 2010
3:04-CV-0703-RAM (D. Nev. Jun. 14, 2010)

Opinion

3:04-CV-0703-RAM.

June 14, 2010


ORDER


Plaintiffs have made a Motion for Reconsideration Re Sealing; and Request for Clarification and Status Conference (Doc. #262). Defendant International Game Technology has opposed the Motion (Doc. #264) and Plaintiffs have replied (Doc. #265).

The court does not believe that it committed clear error in the Order and there has been no newly discovered evidence nor any intervening change in the controlling law.

As an aside, and for clarification purposes, the fact that certain documents have been sealed does not effect their admissibility. A status conference will be held prior to trial for the court and counsel to agree on a procedure on admitting sealed documents into evidence at trial.

Plaintiffs' Motion for Reconsideration (Doc. #262) is DENIED .


Summaries of

Asdale v. International Game Technology

United States District Court, D. Nevada
Jun 14, 2010
3:04-CV-0703-RAM (D. Nev. Jun. 14, 2010)
Case details for

Asdale v. International Game Technology

Case Details

Full title:SHAWN VAN ASDALE, an individual, and LENA VAN ASDALE, an individual…

Court:United States District Court, D. Nevada

Date published: Jun 14, 2010

Citations

3:04-CV-0703-RAM (D. Nev. Jun. 14, 2010)