From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Asciutto v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Jun 17, 1994
26 F.3d 108 (9th Cir. 1994)

Opinion

Nos. 93-70035, 93-70057, 93-70084, 93-70266 and 93-70314.

Submitted, June 7, 1994.

The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. Fed.R.App.P. 34(a); Ninth Circuit Rule 34-4.

Decided June 17, 1994.

Declan J. O'Donnell, Englewood, CO, for petitioners-appellants.

Gary R. Allen, David I. Pincus, Kevin M. Brown, Tax Div., U.S. Dept. of Justice, Washington, DC, for respondent-appellee.

Appeal from the United States Tax Court.

Before: D.W. NELSON, BEEZER and KOZINSKI, Circuit Judges.



ORDER

For the reasons expressed in Bax v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 13 F.3d 54 (2d Cir. 1993), the judgment of the United States Tax Court is affirmed.

The facts in Bax differ from the facts of these cases in only one respect: here, plaintiffs Gaetano and Mary Bruni prepaid the interest with respect to one tax year. The decision in Bax, however, also provides the appropriate rationale for our holding today that, even if the Tax Court had jurisdiction, the taxpayers' claims fail on the merits. See id., 13 F.3d at 58.

AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

Asciutto v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Jun 17, 1994
26 F.3d 108 (9th Cir. 1994)
Case details for

Asciutto v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

Case Details

Full title:ANTHONY L. ASCIUTTO, ANNETTA ASCIUTTO, GAETANO BRUNI, AND MARY E. BRUNI…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: Jun 17, 1994

Citations

26 F.3d 108 (9th Cir. 1994)

Citing Cases

Melin v. C.I.R

The appellants present us with a jurisdictional question that has been answered by a number of our sister…