From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ascension Ariz. v. Amerisure Ins. Co.

United States District Court, District of Arizona
Dec 14, 2022
CV 21-434-TUC-JAS (BGM) (D. Ariz. Dec. 14, 2022)

Opinion

CV 21-434-TUC-JAS (BGM)

12-14-2022

Ascension Arizona dba Carondelet St. Joseph's Hospital, Plaintiff, v. Amerisure Insurance Company, et al. Defendants.


ORDER

JAMES A. SOTO, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Pending before the Court is a Report and Recommendation issued by United States Magistrate Judge Macdonald. A review of the record reflects that the parties have not filed any objections to the Report and Recommendation and the time to file objections has expired. As such, the Court will not consider any objections or new evidence.

The Court has reviewed the record and concludes that Magistrate Judge Macdonald's recommendations are not clearly erroneous. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Fed.R.Civ.P. 72; Johnson v. Zema Systems Corp., 170 F.3d 734, 739 (7th Cir. 1999); Conley v. Crabtree, 14 F.Supp.2d 1203, 1204 (D. Or. 1998).

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED as follows: (1) Magistrate Judge Macdonald's Report and Recommendation (Doc. 38) is accepted and adopted; (2) The motion to remand (Doc. 27) is denied.


Summaries of

Ascension Ariz. v. Amerisure Ins. Co.

United States District Court, District of Arizona
Dec 14, 2022
CV 21-434-TUC-JAS (BGM) (D. Ariz. Dec. 14, 2022)
Case details for

Ascension Ariz. v. Amerisure Ins. Co.

Case Details

Full title:Ascension Arizona dba Carondelet St. Joseph's Hospital, Plaintiff, v…

Court:United States District Court, District of Arizona

Date published: Dec 14, 2022

Citations

CV 21-434-TUC-JAS (BGM) (D. Ariz. Dec. 14, 2022)