From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Asbury v. Warden

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Jun 8, 2021
2:21-cv-00297-TLN-KJN (E.D. Cal. Jun. 8, 2021)

Opinion

2:21-cv-00297-TLN-KJN

06-08-2021

CAMERON ASHBURY, Petitioner, v. WARDEN, Respondent.


ORDER

Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, filed an application for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.

On April 05, 2021, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on Petitioner and which contained notice to Petitioner that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. On April 15, 2021, Petitioner was granted a thirty-day extension of time to file objections or his forms. Petitioner has not filed objections to the findings and recommendations.

The Court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by the magistrate judge's analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations filed April 05, 2021, are ADOPTED IN FULL.

2. This action is DISMISSED without prejudice.

3. The Court declines to issue the certificate of appealability referenced in 28 U.S.C. § 2253.


Summaries of

Asbury v. Warden

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Jun 8, 2021
2:21-cv-00297-TLN-KJN (E.D. Cal. Jun. 8, 2021)
Case details for

Asbury v. Warden

Case Details

Full title:CAMERON ASHBURY, Petitioner, v. WARDEN, Respondent.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Jun 8, 2021

Citations

2:21-cv-00297-TLN-KJN (E.D. Cal. Jun. 8, 2021)