From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Asbury v. Palmer

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
May 16, 2017
Case No. 1:16-CV-701 (W.D. Mich. May. 16, 2017)

Opinion

Case No. 1:16-CV-701

05-16-2017

CODY LEE ASBURY, Petitioner, v. CARMEN PALMER, Respondent.


ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

On April 19, 2017, Magistrate Judge Kent issued a Report and Recommendation (R & R) recommending that the Court deny Petitioner's petition for writ of habeas corpus. The Court has reviewed the R & R recommending that the petition be denied. The R & R was duly served on Petitioner on April 20, 2017. No objections have been filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b). Therefore the Court will adopt the amended R & R.

THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the April 19, 2017 Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 8) is approved and adopted as the Opinion of the Court.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Petitioner's habeas corpus petition is DENIED for the reasons set forth in the Report and Recommendation.

This case is concluded.

A separate judgment will enter. Dated: May 16, 2017

/s/ Gordon J. Quist

GORDON J. QUIST

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Asbury v. Palmer

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
May 16, 2017
Case No. 1:16-CV-701 (W.D. Mich. May. 16, 2017)
Case details for

Asbury v. Palmer

Case Details

Full title:CODY LEE ASBURY, Petitioner, v. CARMEN PALMER, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

Date published: May 16, 2017

Citations

Case No. 1:16-CV-701 (W.D. Mich. May. 16, 2017)