From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Asbury Apts. v. Dayton Bd. of Zoning Appeals

Supreme Court of Ohio
Jan 15, 1997
77 Ohio St. 3d 1229 (Ohio 1997)

Opinion

No. 95-2495

Submitted November 13, 1996 at the Urbana Session —

Decided January 15, 1997.

APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Montgomery County, No. 15109.

Gary L. Froelich, for appellee.

J. Anthony Sawyer, Director of Law, and Steven R. Milby, Senior City Attorney, for appellants Dayton Board of Zoning Appeals and city of Dayton.


Appellee challenged the constitutionality of Dayton Revised Code of General Ordinances 150.128(E), but failed to serve the Attorney General pursuant to R.C. 2721.12. When a statute or municipal ordinance is challenged in a declaratory judgment action, the failure to serve the Attorney General is a jurisdictional defect that can be raised at any time; therefore, because the courts below lacked jurisdiction, we vacate the judgments of the trial court and the court of appeals, and we dismiss this appeal.

MOYER, C.J., DOUGLAS, RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY, PFEIFER, COOK and STRATTON, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Asbury Apts. v. Dayton Bd. of Zoning Appeals

Supreme Court of Ohio
Jan 15, 1997
77 Ohio St. 3d 1229 (Ohio 1997)
Case details for

Asbury Apts. v. Dayton Bd. of Zoning Appeals

Case Details

Full title:ASBURY APARTMENTS, JOINT VENTURE; RPS MANAGEMENT, APPELLEE, v. DAYTON…

Court:Supreme Court of Ohio

Date published: Jan 15, 1997

Citations

77 Ohio St. 3d 1229 (Ohio 1997)
673 N.E.2d 1379

Citing Cases

Wurdlow v. Towing

{¶ 7} These requirements are mandatory and jurisdictional. Osborne v. Mentor (1999), 133 Ohio App.3d 22, 26,…

Spencer v. Freight Handlers, Inc.

And failure to serve the attorney general when filing a declaratory-judgment action under R.C. 2721.12 “is a…