From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Asberry v. Relevante

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Nov 3, 2022
1:22-cv-01365-CDB (PC) (E.D. Cal. Nov. 3, 2022)

Opinion

1:22-cv-01365-CDB (PC)

11-03-2022

TONY ASBERRY, Plaintiff, v. C. RELEVANTE, et al., Defendants.


ORDER DIRECTING THE CLERK OF THE COURT TO CLOSE CASE

Plaintiff has filed a request for voluntary dismissal without prejudice. (Doc. 5.) Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1), a “plaintiff may dismiss an action without a court order by filing . . . a notice of dismissal before the opposing party serves either an answer or a motion for summary judgment.” Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(a)(1)(A)(i). Once a dismissal under Rule 41(a)(1) is properly filed, no order of the court is necessary to effectuate dismissal; the dismissal is effective automatically. Com. Space Mgmt. Co. v. Boeing Co., 193 F.3d 1074, 1078 (9th Cir. 1999). Plaintiff's notice satisfies the requirements of Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(i). Accordingly, the Court DIRECTS the Clerk of the Court to terminate all pending motions and to close this case.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Asberry v. Relevante

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Nov 3, 2022
1:22-cv-01365-CDB (PC) (E.D. Cal. Nov. 3, 2022)
Case details for

Asberry v. Relevante

Case Details

Full title:TONY ASBERRY, Plaintiff, v. C. RELEVANTE, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Nov 3, 2022

Citations

1:22-cv-01365-CDB (PC) (E.D. Cal. Nov. 3, 2022)