Opinion
No. 176-81
Opinion Filed April 6, 1982
1. Contracts — Parol Agreements — Evidence
Trial court's conclusion that nightclub manager and band member had completed a binding agreement without benefit of a writing was supported by ample credible evidence in the record, even though band member had said he would send a written contract but never did, because whether the parties completed a contract, or were merely negotiating prior to a written agreement, was a factual question and supreme court would not disturb that finding on appeal.
2. Damages — Mitigation — Particular Cases
In a breach of contract action, trial court did not err in awarding band member a judgment of $500 plus costs for a cancelled engagement where the court had found that a nightclub manager and the band member had completed a binding agreement and where the record indicated that a band member had testified that he and the other band members unsuccessfully tried to secure other work to replace the cancelled engagement, and therefore the band member had attempted to mitigate his damages.
Appeal from small claims court judgment in breach of contract action. District Court, Unit No. 2, Chittenden Circuit, Connarn, J., presiding. Affirmed.
Blais Cain, Burlington, for Plaintiff.
Harold B. Stevens, Stowe, for Defendant.
Present: Barney, C.J., Billings, Hill, Underwood and Peck, JJ.
The defendant appeals from a small claims court judgment in this breach of contract action. We affirm.
The dispute involved an agreement between a band, of which the plaintiff is a member, and a nightclub which the defendant managed. The defendant employed the band in August of 1980 at the nightclub. The defendant testified that the parties then tentatively agreed to another engagement on September 19 and 20, 1980, for the sum of $700. According to the plaintiff, the agreement was subsequently finalized in a phone conversation. The parties confirmed the dates and the compensation. The plaintiff said he would send a written contract, but he never provided it. The plaintiff testified that the sole purpose of a written contract would be to "protect" him, and he was certain that the parties had reached an agreement. On September 16, 1980, the defendant notified the plaintiff that he was cancelling the engagement, as there was insufficient business for him to keep the nightclub open. The plaintiff and the other band members attempted to obtain another engagement for the evenings, but their efforts failed.
On September 25, 1980, the plaintiff brought suit in the Chittenden District Court under its small claims jurisdiction. The trial court orally made its findings, and concluded that the parties had reached an oral agreement. The court awarded the plaintiff a judgment of $500, plus costs.
The appellant urges reversal on two grounds. First, relying upon New England Box Co. v. Tibbetts, 94 Vt. 285, 110 A. 434 (1920), he contends that the trial court erred in finding an oral contract, because both parties intended to enter into a written agreement. Tibbetts, however, plainly states that whether the parties completed a contract, or were merely negotiating prior to a written agreement, is a factual question. See id. at 289, 110 A. at 436. There was ample credible evidence in the record to support the trial court's conclusion that the parties had completed a binding agreement without benefit of a writing. We will not disturb this finding on appeal. See Frogate v. Kissell, 138 Vt. 167, 168, 412 A.2d 1138, 1139 (1980); V.R.C.P. 52.
The appellant's second contention is equally without merit. He contends that the lower court erred because the plaintiff did not attempt to mitigate his damages. The record flatly contradicts this assertion, as the plaintiff testified that he and the other band members unsuccessfully tried to secure other work to replace the cancelled engagement. Thus, no error appears.
Affirmed.