Summary
denying as untimely § 2255 petition premised on challenge to BOP policy where "the BOP policy was in existence at least since 2006, well before [petitioner] was sentenced and entered federal prison in 2010," so "[petitioner] could have discovered the BOP policy through exercising due diligence over a year before he filed his § 2255 motion"
Summary of this case from United States v. GillespieOpinion
CASE NO. 2:13-cv-872-WHA (WO)
10-08-2014
NUKAK EFFOING ASANANSI, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent.
FINAL JUDGMENT
In accordance with the order entered in this case on this day,
Final Judgment is entered in favor of the United States of America, and against the Petitioner, Nukak Effoing Asanansi, and this case is DISMISSED with prejudice.
DONE this 8th day of October, 2014.
/s/ W. Harold Albritton
W. HAROLD ALBRITTON
SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE