From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Arzu v. Saul

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
May 13, 2021
19 CIVIL 6451 (VSB) (S.D.N.Y. May. 13, 2021)

Opinion

19 CIVIL 6451 (VSB)

05-13-2021

MARTHA YOUNG ARZU, Plaintiff, v. ANDREW M. SAUL, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant.


JUDGMENT

It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: That for the reasons stated in the Court's Order dated May 12, 2021, the Report and Recommendation was filed on November 20, 2020. Although the Report and Recommendation explicitly provided that "[t]he parties shall have 14 days from this date to file written objections," (R&R 41), neither party filed an objection. The Court has reviewed Judge Moses's thorough and well- reasoned Report and Recommendation for clear error and, after careful review of the record, found none. Accordingly, the Report and Recommendation is adopted in its entirety. Plaintiff's motion for judgment on the pleadings, (Doc. 18), is GRANTED, and Defendant's motion for judgment on the pleadings, (Doc. 20), is DENIED. This case is remanded for further proceedings consistent with the Report and Recommendation. Dated: New York, New York

May 13, 2021

RUBY J. KRAJICK

Clerk of Court

BY: /s/ _________

Deputy Clerk


Summaries of

Arzu v. Saul

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
May 13, 2021
19 CIVIL 6451 (VSB) (S.D.N.Y. May. 13, 2021)
Case details for

Arzu v. Saul

Case Details

Full title:MARTHA YOUNG ARZU, Plaintiff, v. ANDREW M. SAUL, Commissioner of Social…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Date published: May 13, 2021

Citations

19 CIVIL 6451 (VSB) (S.D.N.Y. May. 13, 2021)