From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Arzola v. Robles

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Oct 21, 2022
1:20-cv-00816-JLT-SKO (E.D. Cal. Oct. 21, 2022)

Opinion

1:20-cv-00816-JLT-SKO

10-21-2022

ALEJANDRA ARZOLA, Plaintiff, v. OSCAR ROBLES, CITY OF WOODLAKE and DOES 1 through 20 inclusive, Defendants.

Bruce D. Praet, FERGUSON, PRAET & SHERMAN A Professional Corporation Attorneys for Defendant (Doc. 33)


Bruce D. Praet,

FERGUSON, PRAET & SHERMAN

A Professional Corporation

Attorneys for Defendant

(Doc. 33)

ORDER VACATING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE

SHEILA K. OBERTO, MAGISTRATE JUDGE

In view of the parties' stipulation (Doc. 33), and for good cause shown, the initial mandatory scheduling conference set for November 1, 2022, at 9:30 a.m. before Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto is VACATED, to be RESET after the criminal proceedings involving Defendant Robles are resolved. The parties are ORDERED to jointly file a status report every ninety (90) days to advise the Court of the status of the criminal proceedings.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Arzola v. Robles

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Oct 21, 2022
1:20-cv-00816-JLT-SKO (E.D. Cal. Oct. 21, 2022)
Case details for

Arzola v. Robles

Case Details

Full title:ALEJANDRA ARZOLA, Plaintiff, v. OSCAR ROBLES, CITY OF WOODLAKE and DOES 1…

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Oct 21, 2022

Citations

1:20-cv-00816-JLT-SKO (E.D. Cal. Oct. 21, 2022)