From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ary v. Target Corp.

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Jun 17, 2022
4:22-cv-02625-HSG (N.D. Cal. Jun. 17, 2022)

Opinion

4:22-cv-02625-HSG

06-17-2022

SHEJUANA ARY, individually and on behalf of all other persons similarly situated, Plaintiff, v. TARGET CORPORATION, Defendant.


Complaint filed: April 29, 2022

ORDER GRANTING JOINT STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME FOR DEFENDANT TARGET CORPORATION TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT

HON. HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM JR. U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE

ORDER

The Court, having considered the Parties' Joint Stipulation to Extend Time for Defendant Target Corporation to Respond to Plaintiff's Complaint, and good cause appearing therefore, hereby ORDERS:

1. Defendant shall have through and including July 25, 2022 to file an answer or file a response to the Complaint.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Ary v. Target Corp.

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Jun 17, 2022
4:22-cv-02625-HSG (N.D. Cal. Jun. 17, 2022)
Case details for

Ary v. Target Corp.

Case Details

Full title:SHEJUANA ARY, individually and on behalf of all other persons similarly…

Court:United States District Court, Northern District of California

Date published: Jun 17, 2022

Citations

4:22-cv-02625-HSG (N.D. Cal. Jun. 17, 2022)