From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Arwine v. Bannan

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit
Jun 10, 1963
319 F.2d 131 (6th Cir. 1963)

Opinion

No. 15295.

June 10, 1963.

Appeal from the Eastern District of Michigan, S.D., Detroit, Ralph M. Freeman, Judge.

Lee David Arwine, in pro. per.

Frank J. Kelley, Atty. Gen., Robert A. Derengoski, Solicitor Gen., Donald T. Kane, Asst. Atty. Gen., Lansing, Mich., on the brief, for respondent-appellee.

Before CECIL, Chief Judge, O'SULLIVAN, Circuit Judge, and PECK, District Judge.


ORDER.

Oral argument having been waived, and the case having been submitted on the brief of the petitioner-appellant and on the brief of the respondents-appellees, wherein the Attorney General and Solicitor General of the State of Michigan, as counsel for said respondents-appellees recognized that the recent opinion in the case of Fay v. Noia, 372 U.S. 391, 83 S.Ct. 822, 9 L.Ed.2d 837 (1963) requires such action,

It Is Ordered that the district court order dismissing the petition for a writ of habeas corpus be vacated and the case remanded to the district court for consideration on its merits.


Summaries of

Arwine v. Bannan

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit
Jun 10, 1963
319 F.2d 131 (6th Cir. 1963)
Case details for

Arwine v. Bannan

Case Details

Full title:Lee David ARWINE, Petitioner-Appellant, v. William H. BANNAN, Warden…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit

Date published: Jun 10, 1963

Citations

319 F.2d 131 (6th Cir. 1963)